Subfascial vs. Dual Plane Breast Augmentation
Two of the most commonly discussed implant placement techniques are subfascial and dual plane. Both offer distinct advantages, and Dr. Erdal frequently uses both in his practice — selecting the optimal technique for each patient's anatomy and goals. This guide explains the differences.
What is subfascial breast augmentation?
In the subfascial technique, the implant is placed beneath the pectoral fascia — a thin but strong layer of connective tissue that covers the pectoral muscle — but above the muscle itself.
- Provides an additional layer of soft-tissue coverage over the implant
- More natural look and feel compared to purely subglandular placement
- No muscle involvement — therefore no animation deformity
- Less post-operative pain and faster recovery than submuscular techniques
- Ideal for patients with adequate breast tissue and good skin quality
What is dual plane breast augmentation?
In the dual plane technique, the upper portion of the implant sits beneath the pectoral muscle, while the lower portion sits beneath the breast tissue only. The muscle is partially released along the lower border to allow the implant to fill the lower pole naturally.
There are three variations:
- Dual Plane I — minimal muscle release. The muscle covers the upper two-thirds of the implant. Best for patients with good tissue and minimal ptosis.
- Dual Plane II — moderate muscle release. The muscle is detached from the lower breast tissue, allowing the implant to expand the lower pole. Suitable for mild ptosis or a constricted lower pole.
- Dual Plane III — maximum muscle release. The muscle covers only the upper third of the implant. Used for moderate ptosis or when maximum lower-pole expansion is needed.
Head-to-head comparison
| Factor | Subfascial | Dual Plane |
|---|---|---|
| Coverage | Fascia only (above muscle) | Muscle upper + tissue lower |
| Post-op pain | Less — no muscle involvement | Moderate — partial muscle |
| Recovery speed | Faster | Slightly longer |
| Animation deformity | None | Minimal to none |
| Natural upper slope | Good | Excellent |
| Mild ptosis correction | Limited | Good (DP II–III) |
| Very thin patients | May show implant edges | Better coverage superiorly |
| Capsular contracture risk | Slightly higher than submuscular | Lower (partial muscle coverage) |
Which technique does Dr. Erdal recommend?
Both subfascial and dual plane are among Dr. Erdal's most frequently used techniques. The choice depends entirely on your anatomy:
- Subfascial is often preferred for patients with adequate breast tissue, good skin elasticity, and no ptosis — delivering a beautiful result with minimal downtime.
- Dual plane is often preferred for patients with thinner tissue, a tight lower breast pole, or mild ptosis — providing superior upper-pole coverage and a natural breast slope.
Dr. Erdal's approach: "I do not believe in a one-technique-fits-all philosophy. Subfascial and dual plane are both excellent techniques — the key is matching the right technique to the right patient. During your consultation, I evaluate your tissue thickness, chest anatomy and aesthetic goals to recommend the placement that will give you the most natural, long-lasting result."
Other placement options
In addition to subfascial and dual plane, Dr. Erdal also performs subglandular (above the muscle, beneath breast tissue) and submuscular (completely beneath the pectoral muscle) placements when they are the best option for a patient's anatomy. Every decision is individualised.
Find out which technique is right for you
Send your photos for a personalised assessment. Free video consultation available.
WhatsApp Dr. Erdal